Sano v. BTS Motors, LLC et al
| Nona Sano |
| Todd Behringer and BTS Motors, LLC |
| 6:2020cv00135 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| John D Love |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DESIGNATING CASE to Magistrate Judge John D. Love to handle all pretrial matters in this case, except for any motion by plaintiff for certification of a collective action or of similarly-situated status under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 05/15/20. (mll, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER setting Rule 26 deadlines. Meeting Report due by 5/27/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2020 at 10:00 AM by telephone before District Judge J. Campbell Barker. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 4/30/2020. (ndc)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nona Sano. BTS Motors, LLC served on 3/24/2020, answer due 4/27/2020. (Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nona Sano. Todd Behringer served on 3/24/2020, answer due 4/27/2020. (Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Nona Sano Notice of Readiness for Scheduling Conference (Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 Defendants' Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint by BTS Motors, LLC, Todd Behringer.(Cates, Susan) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for BTS Motors, LLC to 4/27/2020; Todd Behringer to 4/27/2020. 14 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( gsg ) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re BTS Motors, LLC, Todd Behringer.( Cates, Susan) |
| NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the Motion for Extension of Time, Entry #3 submitted. Incorrect Docket Event. Correction should be made within 1 Business Day. (gsg) |
| Filing 3 ***Deficient Filing. Incorrect Docket Event. To be Re-Filed by Attorney.*** Unopposed MOTION for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by BTS Motors, LLC, Todd Behringer. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Cates, Susan) Modified on 4/14/2020 (gsg). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to BTS Motors, LLC and Todd Behringer. Emailed to plaintiff to serve. (ndc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7716530.), filed by Nona Sano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Joshua) |
| District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
| MINUTE ORDER adopting in this case Judge Barker's standing orders, which may be obtained from his court-website page. Noncompliance with those standing orders may result in a sanction or other disadvantage. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
