Aspen Specialty Insurance Company v. Yin Investments USA, LP
| Aspen Specialty Insurance Company |
| Yin Investments USA, LP |
| 6:2020cv00154 |
| March 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 6/19/2020 11:00 AM before District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 05/08/20. (mll, )
|
| Filing 8 ORIGINAL ANSWER to #5 Amended Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Aspen Specialty Insurance Company.(Smither, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Aspen Specialty Insurance Company Certificate of Interested Parties (Smither, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Yin Investments USA, LP Certificate of Interested Parties (Evans, Carin) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED ANSWER to Original #1 Complaint For Declaratory Judgment, Amended COUNTERCLAIM and Affirmative Defenses against Aspen Specialty Insurance Company by Yin Investments USA, LP. (Evans, Carin) |
| Filing 4 Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM to Plaintiff's OC for Declaratory Judgment against Aspen Specialty Insurance Company by Yin Investments USA, LP.(Evans, Carin) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aspen Specialty Insurance Company. Yin Investments USA, LP served on 3/30/2020, answer due 5/29/2020. (Smither, John) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Yin Investments USA, LP and emailed to plaintiff to serve. (ndc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against Yin Investments USA, LP ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7728230.), filed by Aspen Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smither, John) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
| District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle added. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aspen Specialty Insurance Company v. Yin Investments USA, LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Yin Investments USA, LP | |
| Represented By: | Carin "CJ" Evans |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aspen Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | John Jackson Smither |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
