Dixon v. England et al
| Lawrence E Dixon |
| Dr Saraha Pierson, Warden Auderey England, Karen D Pyle and Hodge Administration and Supervisors |
| 6:2020cv00260 |
| May 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| John D Love |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
| Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D Love. (mll, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Lawrence E Dixon. (mll, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lawrence E Dixon. (mll, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Auderey England, Hodge Administration and Supervisors, Saraha Pierson, Karen D Pyle, filed by Lawrence E Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Summons(es), #3 Envelope(s))(mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
