Garza v. Davis et al
| Rosfel Garza |
| Allen Barker, Timothy Jones, Unknown Party and Lorie Davis |
| 6:2020cv00331 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Rosfel Garza as to #10 Order Re Collection and Payment of Full Filing Fee. Received 7/30/2020. (ndc) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE/OBJECTIONS to #1 Order of Severance, by Rosfel Garza. (mll, ) |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Rosfel Garza as to #1 Order. Received 7/10/2020. (ndc) |
| Filing 12 Letter regarding IFP status from Rosfel Garza (mll, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Affidavit of Facts by Rosfel Garza (mll, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER Re Collection and Payment of Full Filing Fee. Plaintiff's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 , and #7 , are GRANTED. Because the Plaintiff has no current assets, no partial filing fee shall be assessed. In the event that the Plaintiff subsequently receives deposits in his inmate trust account, the agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to the Plaintiff's inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 07/17/20. (mll, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 07/17/20. (mll, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Rosfel Garza. (mll, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rosfel Garza. (mll, ) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Rosfel Garza as to #4 Deficiency Order; RRECEIVED 6-30-2020. (mll, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rosfel Garza. (Attachments: #1 Financial Data Sheet, #2 Cover Letter/Envelope)(gsg) |
|
Filing 4
DEFICIENCY ORDER. Plaintiff has 30 days from receipt of this order to either pay the $400 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified in forma pauperis data sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 06/22/20. (mll, )
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Allen Barker, Lorie Davis, Timothy Jones, Unknown Party, Unknown Party, filed by Rosfel Garza. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Additional Exhibits) (CLAIMS SEVERED FROM CIVIL ACTION 6:20CV322.)(mll, ) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER OF SEVERANCE. All claims asserted against Defendants Lorie Davis, Allen Barker, Unknown PartyRegional Islamic Chaplain, Timothy Jones, and Unknown Partythe Assistant Director of Chaplaincy for TDCJ-CID shall be SEVERED from the claims and Defendants in Cause No. 6:20cv322 into a separate cause of action. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 06/18/20. (mll, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
