Holmes v. Davis et al
Koty Holmes |
Allen Barker, Unknown Party, Lorie Davis and Timothy Jones |
6:2020cv00333 |
June 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Jeremy D Kernodle |
K Nicole Mitchell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Koty Holmes as to #11 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. Received 8/7/2020. (ndc) |
Filing 11 ORDER that the motion to exempt or waive the initial partial filing fee of $0.44 #10 is DENIED. The Court will construe Plaintiff's motion as a motion for extension of time to pay the initial partial filing fee. The initial partial filing fee of $0.44 is due no later than 30 days from the receipt of this Order. Plaintiff is placed on notice that the lawsuit may be dismissed if he fails to timely pay the initial partial filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 07/28/20. (mll, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration re #9 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee, by Koty Holmes. (mll, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee of $0.44 within 30 days for Koty Holmes. Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 8/17/2020. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #7 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 07/15/20. (mll, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER that Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Court's Discretionary Order for Severance #6 , construed as a motion to reconsider the Order of Severance, is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 07/15/20. (mll, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Koty Holmes. (mll, ) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE/Objections to #1 Order of Severance, by Koty Holmes. (mll, ) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Koty Holmes as to #4 Order. Received 6/29/2020. (ndc) |
Filing 4 DEFICIENCY ORDER. Plaintiff has 30 days from receipt of this order to either pay the $400 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified in forma pauperis data sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 06/22/20. (mll, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Allen Barker, Lorie Davis, Timothy Jones, Unknown Party(Assistant Director of Chaplaincy, TDCJ-CID), Unknown Party(Regional Islamic Chaplain), filed by Koty Holmes. (CLAIMS SEVERED FROM CIVIL ACTION 6:20CV326)(mll, ) |
Filing 1 ORDER OF SEVERANCE. All claims asserted against Defendants Lorie Davis, Allen Barker, Unknown PartyRegional Islamic Chaplain, Timothy Jones, and Unknown Partythe Assistant Director of Chaplaincy for TDCJ-CID shall be SEVERED from the claims and Defendants in Cause No. 6:20cv326, and added to a separate cause of action. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 06/18/20. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.