Lacy v. Texas Attorney General et al
Plaintiff: Samuel Joe Arthur Lacy, Jr
Defendant: 77th Judicial District Court, Texas Attorney General and Child Support & Social Service Office
Case Number: 6:2020cv00453
Filed: August 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeremy D Kernodle
Referring Judge: K Nicole Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2020 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 09/29/20. (mll, )
August 24, 2020 Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Samuel Joe Arthur Lacy, Jr on 8/21/2020 as to #4 Order. (gsg)
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO REPLEAD re #1 Complaint filed by Samuel Joe Arthur Lacy, Jr. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of this Order to file an amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 8/18/2020. (gsg)
August 17, 2020 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, )
August 14, 2020 Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, )
August 14, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Samuel Joe Arthur Lacy, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mll, )
August 14, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 77th Judicial District Court, Child Support & Social Service Office, Texas Attorney General, filed by Samuel Joe Arthur Lacy, Jr.(mll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lacy v. Texas Attorney General et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 77th Judicial District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Texas Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Child Support & Social Service Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Joe Arthur Lacy, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?