Anthony et al v. Concept Logistics, Inc. et al
| Jon Colton Anthony and Sierra Ruiz |
| Concept Logistics, Inc. and Richard Belcher |
| 6:2020cv00601 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 2/22/2021. Discovery due by 7/19/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 2/22/2021. Jury Selection set for 11/15/2021 at 09:00 AM in Tyler Courthouse before District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. Jury Trial set for 11/15/2021 at 09:00 AM in Tyler Courthouse before District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. Dispositive Motions due by 8/13/2021. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/18/2021. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 12/22/2020. (gsg)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER denying as moot #9 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 12/22/2020. (gsg)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Richard Belcher, Concept Logistics, Inc..(Fee, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 Submission of Proposed Agreed Docket Control/Scheduling order by Richard Belcher, Concept Logistics, Inc. . (Fee, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Fee, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss filed by Jon Colton Anthony. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goudarzi, Joel) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jon Colton Anthony.(Goudarzi, Joel) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss by Concept Logistics, Inc.. (Fee, Thomas) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 16 Pretrial Conference set for teleconference 1/13/2021 10:00 AM before District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 11/13/20. (mll, )
|
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jon Colton Anthony. (Goudarzi, Joel) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Richard Belcher. (Filed in state court as "Defendant Richard Belcher's Original Answer")(mll, ) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Concept Logistics, Inc. (Filed in state court as "Defendant Concept Logistics, Inc's Original Answer").(mll, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Richard Belcher, Concept Logistics, Inc., filed by Jon Colton Anthony, Sierra Ruiz. (Filed in state court as "Plaintiffs' Original Petition and Request for Disclosure")(mll, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ryan Timothy Funderburg on behalf of All Defendants (Funderburg, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Richard Belcher, Concept Logistics, Inc. from 123rd District Court of Panola County, TX, case number 2020-251. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-8097791), filed by Richard Belcher, Concept Logistics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Dox, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fee, Thomas) |
| District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle added. (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
