Emmett v. TDCJ Corporation et al
| Barry Emmett |
| TDCJ Corporation, Walker County Corporation, State of Texas Corporation and UTMB Corporation |
| 6:2021cv00002 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| John D Love |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE with attached exhibits by Barry Emmett (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mll, ) |
| Filing 13 SEALED ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to Main Document: Medical Information re #12 Letter. (gsg) |
| Filing 12 Letter from Barry Emmett regarding disabilities (gsg) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Barry Emmett (mll, ) |
| Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT. Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis, but without prejudice as to the refiling of his claims without seeking in forma pauperis status. All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 01/25/21. (mll, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge #5 as the findings of this Court. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 . Further, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's civil rights lawsuit, with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis, but without prejudice as to the refiling of his lawsuit without seeking in forma pauperis status. If Plaintiff pays the requisite $400 filing fee within fifteen days of this Order, the lawsuit shall proceed as though the full filing fee had been paid from the outset. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 01/25/21. (mll, )
|
| Filing 8 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Barry Emmett. (mll, ) |
| Filing 7 Letter w/attached exhibits from Barry Emmett (mll, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Joinder by Barry Emmett. (mll, ) |
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 should be denied and the above-styled lawsuit should be dismissed, with prejudice, for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis. It is also recommended that if Plaintiff pays the full filing fee within 15 days of the date of the dismissal order, the lawsuit will proceed as though the full filing fee had been paid from the outset. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 01/06/21. (mll, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Additional Claims by Barry Emmett (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D Love. (mll, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Barry Emmett. (mll, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Texas Corporation, TDCJ Corporation, UTMB Corporation, Walker County Corporation, filed by Barry Emmett. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
