Dickens v. Skeen et al
Plaintiff: Darren Dickens
Defendant: Jack Skeen, Jr, Zachary W Davis and Matt Bingham
Case Number: 6:2021cv00049
Filed: January 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: J Campbell Barker
Referring Judge: John D Love
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2021 Partial Filing fee paid per court order: $120.00, Pay.Gov import number 629257 (maj, )
February 11, 2021 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by TDCJ Local Funds as to #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Received 2/5/2021. (ndc)
February 11, 2021 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Darren Dickens as to #6 Order on Motion for Discovery, #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Received 2/5/2021. (ndc)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying #3 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 1/29/2021. (gsg)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 1/29/2021. (gsg)
January 29, 2021 Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D Love. (mll, )
January 29, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Discovery by Darren Dickens. (mll, )
January 29, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darren Dickens. (mll, )
January 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matt Bingham, Zachary W Davis, Jack Skeen, Jr, filed by Darren Dickens. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope(s))(mll, )
January 29, 2021 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dickens v. Skeen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Skeen, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zachary W Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Bingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darren Dickens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?