Pratt v. Hall et al
Herbert Hoover Pratt, III |
Keith Gorsuch, Jane Doe, Stacie Crowley, John Doe, Gene Miller, Terry Burson, Amy Oliver, Alvis Hall, Miguel Martinez and William Wheat |
6:2021cv00192 |
May 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
J Campbell Barker |
K Nicole Mitchell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RESPONSE to #8 Order for More Definite Statement, by Herbert Hoover Pratt, III. (mll, ) |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Herbert Hoover Pratt, III as to #7 Order Re Collection and Payment of Full Filing Fee. Received 6/7/2021. (ndc) |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Herbert Hoover Pratt, III as to #8 Order. Received 6/9/2021. (ndc) |
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Herbert Hoover Pratt, III on 5/25/2021 as to #5 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee. (gsg) |
Filing 8 ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. Plaintiff is directed to answer the foregoing questions to the best of his ability based on personal knowledge and the information available to him. Plaintiff's response is due 30 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 06/02/21. (mll, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER Re Collection and Payment of Full Filing Fee. Plaintiff shall pay $308.30, the balance of the full filing fee, in monthly installments. The agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to the Plaintiff's inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 06/01/21. (mll, ) |
INITIAL Partial Filing fee paid per court order: $ 41.70, receipt number 6-56885 (mll, ) |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. CASE: 6:21-cv-00192DETAILS: Case transferred from Texas Eastern has been opened in SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS as case 2:21-cv-00100, filed 05/18/2021 (mll, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee of $41.70 within 30 days for Herbert Hoover Pratt, III. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 5/19/2021. (gsg) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF PARTIAL SEVERANCE AND TRANSFER. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Gene Miller and Miguel Martinez are SEVERED from this lawsuit and TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division. The Clerk shall transfer the claims against Defendants Gene Miller and Miguel Martinez forthwith and without delay to the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 05/18/21. (mll, ) |
Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Herbert Hoover Pratt, III. (mll, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Herbert Hoover Pratt, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(mll, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.