Dixon v. McDanial et al
| Lawrence E Dixon |
| Ms. Karen Pyle, Ms. Auderey A. England, Dr. Saraha Pierson, Medical Department and John McDanial |
| Hodge Prison Administration Supervisor |
| 6:2021cv00205 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Lawrence E Dixon. (mll, ) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Lawrence E Dixon as to #8 Report and Recommendations. Received 6/2/2021. (ndc) |
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the above-styled civil rights lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice, with refiling contingent upon payment of the full filing fee or a credible and specific showing of imminent danger. Should Plaintiff pay the full filing fee within 15 days after the date of entry of dismissal, he should be allowed to proceed in this lawsuit as though the full fee had been paid from the outset. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 05/26/21. (mll, ) |
| Filing 7 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, ) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Middle; Case Number 1:21-cv-00935. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - AND SO, on this 25th day of May 2021, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; 2. Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is left to the discretion of the transferee court; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. See Order for further details. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 5/25/21. (dmn) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/25/2021.]
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Fed & Local Rules) (lp) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/25/2021.] |
| Filing 3 AO 398 and AO 399 Waiver of Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (lp) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/25/2021.] |
| Filing 2 UNCERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lawrence E. Dixon.(lp) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/25/2021.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ms. Auderey A. England, Hodge Prison Administration Supervisor, John McDanial, Medical Department, Dr. Saraha Pierson, Ms. Karen Pyle lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Lawrence E. Dixon.(lp) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/25/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.