Vanover v. SIMM Associates, Inc.
| Candace Vanover |
| SIMM Associates, Inc. |
| 6:2021cv00210 |
| June 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| John D Love |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER that parties submit closing documents no later than 8-20-2021. If closing documents are not submitted by that date, the Court ORDERS parties to submit a joint status report regarding the status of the settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 07/06/21. (mll, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement by Candace Vanover (Hyslip, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Candace Vanover. SIMM Associates, Inc. served on 6/9/2021, answer due 6/30/2021. (Hyslip, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge John D. Love to the full extent authorized by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) to handle all pretrial matters in this case, including dispositive motions. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 06/11/21. (mll, )
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to SIMM Associates, Inc., and emailed to plaintiff for service. (mll, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against SIMM Associates, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8437080.), filed by Candace Vanover. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hyslip, Jeffrey) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Candace Vanover. (mll, ) |
| District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (mll, ) |
| MINUTE ORDER adopting in this case Judge Barker's standing orders, which may be obtained from his page on the court's website and may be updated without separate docket entry. All parties and counsel are ordered to stay abreast of the current standing orders and to comply with those orders and with the court's local rules. Noncompliance with those standing orders or local rules may result in a sanction or other disadvantage. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vanover v. SIMM Associates, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SIMM Associates, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Candace Vanover | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Scott Hyslip |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
