Miller v. Arcipreste et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Thomas Miller
Defendant: Samuel Arcipreste, Cortez Williams and J. Barrett
Case Number: 6:2022cv00052
Filed: February 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeremy D Kernodle
Referring Judge: K Nicole Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2022 Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Joshua Thomas Miller. (gsg)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY re #3 Amended Complaint filed by Joshua Thomas Miller. ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $402 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall accept no other documents from Plaintiff until he has complied with this Order, with the exception of a motion for extension of time. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/14/2022. (gsg) Modified on 3/29/2022 (wea, ).
February 9, 2022 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Samuel Arcipreste, J. Barrett, Cortez Williams, filed by Joshua Thomas Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope(s))(wea, )
February 9, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Samuel Arcipreste, J. Barrett, Cortez Williams, filed by Joshua Thomas Miller. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope(s))(wea, )
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER OF SEVERANCE. (Original Case No. 6:21-cv-20) Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/9/2022. (wea, ) Modified on 2/9/2022 (wea, ).
February 9, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. MAILED Consent form to Plaintiff. (wea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Arcipreste et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Thomas Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel Arcipreste
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cortez Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?