Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant: John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and Darron Lane
Case Number: 6:2022cv00061
Filed: February 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeremy D Kernodle
Referring Judge: K Nicole Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF TRANSFER re #1 Complaint, filed by Christopher Michael Hinshaw. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/15/2022. (gsg)
February 15, 2022 Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mitchell (gsg)
February 15, 2022 Intradistrict Transfer to Lufkin. Lufkin Case Number 9:22-cv-22. (gsg)
February 15, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (gsg)
February 14, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Christopher Michael Hinshaw. (gsg)
February 14, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with Financial Data Statement by Christopher Michael Hinshaw. (Attachments: #1 Financial Statement)(gsg)
February 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis, John Frederick, Darron Lane, filed by Christopher Michael Hinshaw. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - A, #2 Exhibit - B, #3 Exhibit - C, #4 Exhibit - D1, #5 Exhibit - D2, #6 Exhibit - D3, #7 Exhibit - D4, #8 Cover Letter)(gsg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Frederick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mohammed Abubakari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darron Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?