Perry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Michael Dean Perry |
Director, TDCJ-CID |
6:2022cv00064 |
February 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
J Campbell Barker |
K Nicole Mitchell |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. The Petitioner shall have until May 6, 2022, in which to file such objections as he may have to the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/28/2022. (wea, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to #4 Report and Recommendations, by Michael Dean Perry. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(wea, ) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Michael Dean Perry as to #3 Order. RECEIVED 03/01/2022. (wea, ) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT in Support re Filing Fee Received by Michael Dean Perry. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(wea, ) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that the above-styled application for the writ of habeas corpus be dismissed with prejudice as to its refiling without permission from the Fifth Circuit, but without prejudice as to its refiling once such permission has been obtained. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/7/2022. (wea, ) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-59862 (jbe, ) |
Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER. The Petitioner shall have until April 1, 2022 in which to either: (1) pay the statutory $5.00 filing fee, or (2) furnish an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/22/2022. (wea, ) |
Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. (wea, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 2/17/2022) (wea, ). |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. MAILED Consent form to Petitioner. (wea, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Dean Perry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Envelope(s))(wea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Perry v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael Dean Perry | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.