Lopez v. East Texas Treatment Facility et al
| Luis B. Lopez |
| East Texas Treatment Facility, M. Upshaw, Practice Manager MTC Brant Cain, Provider MTC Unknown Helt and Nurse MTC unknown Lowis |
| 6:2022cv00148 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| John D Love |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Texas Attorney General as to #12 Order to Answer and Scheduling Order. (wea, ) . |
Filing 12
ORDER TO ANSWER AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Defendants (Cain, Helt, and Lowis) shall have thirty (30) days from the date of service in which to answer or otherwise plead to the Plaintiff's claims against them. East Texas Treatment Facility and M. Upshaw (Warden, East Texas Treatment Facility) terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 6/9/2022. (wea, )
|
| Filing 11 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brant Cain, Unknown Helt, unknown Lowis, filed by Luis B. Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(jbe, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Luis B. Lopez **EFFECTIVE JULY 25, 2022** (jbe, ) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Luis B. Lopez as to #8 Order and 1983 form. Received 5/18/2022. (ndc) |
|
Filing 8
SECOND ORDER to Replead re #7 Amended Complaint filed by Luis B. Lopez. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 5/12/2022. (gsg)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against East Texas Treatment Facility, filed by Luis B. Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Request Forms, #3 Grievance Forms, #4 Medical Information, #5 Envelope(s))(gsg) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by TDCJ Local Funds Division as to #4 Order. Received 4/26/2022. (ndc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of this order to file an amended complaint on the approved Section 1983 complaint form, stating specific facts to support his claim(s). Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 4/20/2022. (wea, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING FILING FEE. Plaintiff's #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. No partial filing fee shall be assessed. In the event that the Plaintiff subsequently receives deposits in his inmate trust account, the agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to the Plaintiff's inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis provided the account exceeds $10.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 4/20/2022. (wea, )
|
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (wea, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. CONSENT form mailed to Plaintiff. (wea, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luis B. Lopez. (wea, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against East Texas Treatment Facility, M. Upshaw, filed by Luis B. Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(wea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
