Feaster v. Schlumberger et al
| Kenneth Feaster |
| Schlumberger, Cameron, a Schlumberger Company, Jose Daniel Gonzalez and Kirby McFadden |
| 6:2022cv00226 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 1/12/2023. (wea, ) |
Filing 24
ORDER ADOPTING #23 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motion to dismiss #12 and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims in this case with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 1/12/2023. (wea, )
|
| Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #12 be GRANTED and that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 12/15/2022. (wea, ) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Cameron, a Schlumberger Company, Jose Daniel Gonzalez, Kirby McFadden. (Nye, James) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss. Defendants shall have seven (7) additional days to file their reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss, and such reply shall be due on or before October 13, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 10/5/2022. (wea, )
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss by Cameron, a Schlumberger Company, Jose Daniel Gonzalez, Kirby McFadden. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nye, James) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to #18 Response to Non-Motion (i.e., Opposition to Plaintiff's Response to Show Cause Order) filed by Cameron, a Schlumberger Company, Jose Daniel Gonzalez, Kirby McFadden. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nye, James) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to #15 Order to Show Cause filed by Kenneth Feaster. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(wea, ) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kenneth Feaster. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(wea, ) |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Kenneth Feaster as to #15 Order to Show Cause. Received on 9/22/2022. (ndc) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff shall have seven (7) days from receipt of this Order to show cause as to why the lawsuit should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/19/2022. (wea, )
|
| Instructions re ECF registration request was emailed to Mr. Feaster on 7/6/2022 and resent per his request on 8/8/2022. (saenz, ) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Cameron, a Schlumberger Company (Nye, James) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rachael Elizabeth Thompson on behalf of Cameron, a Schlumberger Company, Jose Daniel Gonzalez, Kirby McFadden (Thompson, Rachael) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Cameron, a Schlumberger Company, Jose Daniel Gonzalez, Kirby McFadden, Schlumberger. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Rachael E. Thompson, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Nye, James) |
| Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Schlumberger. See attached Remarks. (wea, ) |
| Filing 10 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Jose Daniel Gonzalez. See attached Remarks. (wea, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed Cameron, a Schlumberger Company. Process sent certified mail and confirmed received on 6/28/2022, signed by Kirby McFadden, answer due 7/19/2022. (wea, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Kirby McFadden. Process sent certified mail and confirmed received on 6/28/2022, signed by Kirby McFadden, answer due 7/19/2022. (wea, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Cameron, a Schlumberger Company, Jose Daniel Gonzalez, Kirby McFadden, Schlumberger, and forwarded to US Marshal for service. (wea, ). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to File Electronically. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 6/22/2022. (wea, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue summons. The Court, having determined that appointment of the United States Marshal to serve process is necessary and appropriate in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 6/22/2022. (wea, )
|
| Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. (wea, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Electronically by Kenneth Feaster. (wea, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Feaster. (wea, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cameron, a Schlumberger Company, Jose Daniel Gonzalez, Kirby McFadden, Schlumberger, filed by Kenneth Feaster. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(wea, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. MAILED Consent form to Plaintiff. (wea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
