Jaramillo v. Pace et al
| Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. |
| Pamela Pace, Daniel Comeaux, LVN Wanda Oliver, Molly Emerson, TDCJ Health Services Division and Sergeant FNU Pedro |
| 6:2022cv00256 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall refuse to file and must promptly return to Plaintiff any further documents he submits in this case other than a notice of appeal or a post-judgment motion under Rule 59 or Rule 60. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 8/22/2022. (wea, )
|
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Daniel Comeaux, Wanda Oliver, Pamela Pace, FNU Pedro, TDCJ Health Services Division, filed by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr.(jbe, ) |
| Filing 13 OBJECTION to #10 Report and Recommendations by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Envelope(s))(jbe, ) |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr as to #10 Report and Recommendations. Received 8/8/2022. (ndc) |
| Civil action dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 and #11 notice of voluntary dismissal. (ndc) |
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the United States Magistrate Judge re #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. Recommended that the Court should deny Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #7) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and summarily dismiss this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 8/2/2022. (gsm) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(wea, ) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr as to #5 Order. Received 7/25/2022. (ndc) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Financial Data, #2 Cover Letter)(gsm) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr of docket sheet. Received 7/21/2022. (ndc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO AMEND AND PAY FEE. Plaintiff shall have forty-five (45) days from entry of this order to file an amended complaint on the standard Section 1983 form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff has forty-five (45) days from the entry of this order to pay the $402 filing fee to proceed with this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 7/19/2022. (wea, )
|
| Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mitchell (gsm) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (gsm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF SEVERANCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 7/11/2022. (gsm)
|
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - 1, #2 Exhibit - 2, #3 Exhibit - 3)(gsm) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER TO REPLEAD. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/21/2022. (gsm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
