Eidam v. Faught et al
Plaintiff: Jason Eidam
Defendant: David Faught, Cody Barnett and Tx Henderson County
Case Number: 6:2022cv00297
Filed: August 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: J Campbell Barker
Referring Judge: John D Love
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2022 Filing 17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jason Eidam as to Orders #7 and #8 (gsm)
September 23, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Rawles Fulgham, IV on behalf of Cody Barnett, David Faught, Tx Henderson County (Fulgham, John)
September 23, 2022 Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint (and Affirmative Defenses) by Cody Barnett, David Faught, Tx Henderson County.(Davis, Robert)
September 9, 2022 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Tx Henderson County served on 9/2/2022, answer due 9/23/2022. (gsm)
September 9, 2022 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed. David Faught served on 9/2/2022, answer due 9/23/2022. (gsm)
September 9, 2022 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Cody Barnett served on 9/2/2022, answer due 9/23/2022. (gsm)
August 31, 2022 Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jason Eidam as to #7 Order. (wea, )
August 31, 2022 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by the US Marshal as to #8 Order to Answer, #9 Summons Issued. (Received 8/31/2022) (wea, )
August 30, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued as to Cody Barnett, David Faught, Tx Henderson County, and forwarded to US Marshal for service. (Attachments: #1 Barnett, #2 Henderson County)(wea, )
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO ANSWER AND SCHEDULING ORDER. The Clerk shall issue process to the Defendants, and the Defendants shall have thirty (30) days from the date of such service in which to answer or otherwise plead to the Plaintiff's complaint against them. The Court having determined that appointment of the United States Marshal to serve process is necessary and appropriate in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/30/2022. (wea, )
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING FILING FEE. Plaintiff's #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. No partial filing fee shall be assessed. In the event that the Plaintiff subsequently receives deposits in his inmate trust account, the agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to the Plaintiff's inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis provided the account exceeds $10.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/19/2022. (wea, )
August 15, 2022 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Jason Eidam. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope(s))(jbe, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/16/2022) (jbe, ).
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY re #1 Complaint filed by Jason Eidam. ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this order to either pay the $402 filing fee or submit a certified six-month trust account statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/4/2022. (gsm)
August 3, 2022 Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love (jbe, )
August 3, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason Eidam. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(jbe, )
August 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jason Eidam. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(jbe, )
August 3, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Mailed Consent Form to Plaintiff (jbe, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eidam v. Faught et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Eidam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Faught
Represented By: Robert Scott Davis
Represented By: John Rawles Fulgham, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cody Barnett
Represented By: Robert Scott Davis
Represented By: John Rawles Fulgham, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tx Henderson County
Represented By: Robert Scott Davis
Represented By: John Rawles Fulgham, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?