Manziel v. Dollar General Corporation et al
| Dorothy Jayne Manziel |
| Dollar General Corporation and DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC. doing business as Dollar General Corporation |
| 6:2022cv00346 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER setting Rule 26 deadlines. Meeting Report due by 11/25/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 12/1/2022 at 10:00 AM by telephone before District Judge J. Campbell Barker. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 10/26/2022. (ndc)
|
| Filing 9 ORIGINAL ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC..(White, Phillip) |
| Filing 8 Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Dollar General Corporation.(White, Phillip) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dorothy Jayne Manziel. DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC. served on 9/1/2022, answer due 9/22/2022. (Hart, John) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dorothy Jayne Manziel. Dollar General Corporation served on 9/1/2022, answer due 9/22/2022. (Hart, John) |
| Filing 5 ***DEFICIENT FILING. PLEASE DISREGARD.*** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. d/b/a Dollar General Corporation on 09/01/2022, filed by Dorothy Jayne Manziel. (Hart, John) Modified on 9/8/2022 (wea, ). |
| Filing 4 ***DEFICIENT FILING. PLEASE DISREGARD.*** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Dollar General Corporation on 09/01/2022, filed by Dorothy Jayne Manziel. (Hart, John) Modified on 9/8/2022 (wea, ). |
| NOTICE of Deficiency regarding Affidavit of Service for Summons, Entries #4 and #5 submitted. Incorrect docketing event. To be refiled using event Summons Returned Executed.(wea, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC. and Dollar General Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ndc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Dorothy Jayne Manziel Certificate of Interested Persons (Hart, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9099774.), filed by Dorothy Jayne Manziel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hart, John) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/31/2022: #2 Civil Cover Sheet (corrected)) (wea, ). |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dorothy Jayne Manziel. (wea, ) |
| COURT ORDER: The court adopts in this case Judge Barker's standing orders, which may be obtained from his page on the court's website and may be updated without separate docket entry. All parties and counsel are ordered to stay abreast of the current standing orders and to comply with those orders and with the court's local rules. Noncompliance with those standing orders or local rules may result in a sanction or other disadvantage. (wea, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (wea, ) |
| District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (wea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
