Dixon v. Skyview Unit et al
Plaintiff: Fred A Dixon
Defendant: Skyview Unit, Cherokee County and President Biden
Case Number: 6:2022cv00348
Filed: August 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: J Campbell Barker
Referring Judge: John D Love
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2022 Filing 17 FINAL JUDGMENT. All claims in the matter are dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), but without prejudice as to the refiling of the lawsuit with payment of the filing fee. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 10/20/2022. (ndc)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for #6 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without payment #2 is denied. This case is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), but without prejudice as to the refiling of the lawsuit with payment of the full filing fee. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 10/20/2022. (ndc)
October 18, 2022 Letter #15 returned to Mr. Dixon per Order #12 . (wea, )
October 13, 2022 Filing 15 ***FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE DISREGARD.***Letter from Fred Dixon (gsm) Modified on 10/18/2022 (wea, ).
October 8, 2022 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Biden, filed by Fred A Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(jbe, )
September 30, 2022 Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Fred A Dixon as to #12 Order, 1983 and IFP forms. Received 9/23/2022. (ndc)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Regarding Statements of Claim. The Clerk shall furnish Plaintiff with a blank complaint form and a prisoner IFP application form with this Order. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must include the matter number assigned to this case on any document he intends to file in this case. The Clerk is directed not to docket any further submissions from Plaintiff in this case that do not bear this matter number other than an objection to the pending Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 9/19/2022. (wea, )
September 16, 2022 Filing 11 Statement of Claim by Fred A Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(wea, )
September 14, 2022 Filing 10 Statement of Claim by Fred A Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(wea, )
September 12, 2022 Filing 9 Statement of Claim by Fred A Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(wea, )
September 12, 2022 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Fred A Dixon as to #6 Report and Recommendations. Received at EDTX on 9/12/2022. (ndc)
September 6, 2022 Filing 7 Statement of Claims from Fred Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s)) (jbe, )
September 1, 2022 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court should deny Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #2 and summarily dismiss this action unless, within fifteen (15) days, Plaintiff pays the full filing fee of $402.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 9/1/2022. (wea, )
August 31, 2022 Filing 5 Statement of Claime from Fred Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s)) (jbe, )
August 31, 2022 Filing 4 Statement of Claims from Fred Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s)) (jbe, )
August 29, 2022 Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love (jbe, )
August 29, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fred A Dixon. (jbe, )
August 29, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Fred A Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(jbe, )
August 29, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Consent mailed to Plaintiff. (jbe, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. Skyview Unit et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred A Dixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skyview Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cherokee County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: President Biden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?