Capps et al v. Henderson County et al
| MD Robert Capps and RN Aily Hoang |
| Henderson County and James Bailey |
| 6:2022cv00391 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued as to James Bailey and Henderson County. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ndc)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DESIGNATING CASE to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. The court designates a magistrate judge to the full extent authorized by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) to handle all pretrial matters in this case, including dispositive motions. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 10/7/2022. (wea, ).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Edward L Pina on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9157976. (Pina, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Plaintiffs' Original Complaint against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9157902.), filed by Robert Capps. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons(es) Summons to Henderson County, #3 Summons(es) Sommons to James Bailey)(Pina, Edward)
|
|
District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (gsm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
