Bulnes v. Abis Auto Transport, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Ely Bulnes
Defendant: Abis Auto Transport, Inc and Alberto Hernandez
Case Number: 6:2022cv00497
Filed: December 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: J Campbell Barker
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER (DEFENDANTS' ORIGINAL ANSWER AS FILED IN THE STATE COURT ACTION) to #3 Complaint by Abis Auto Transport, Inc, Alberto Hernandez.(wea, )
December 29, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT (PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AS FILED IN THE STATE COURT ACTION) against Abis Auto Transport, Inc, Alberto Hernandez, filed by Ely Bulnes.(wea, )
December 29, 2022 Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A List of Parties, #2 Exhibit B Civil Cover Sheet and State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit C List of Attorneys, #4 Exhibit D Parties Requesting Trial by Jury, #5 Exhibit E District Court Information, #6 Exhibit F Parties Consent to Removal, #7 Exhibit G Def Who Consent to Removal)(Lea, Kelly).
December 29, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Ely Bulnes ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9287158.), filed by Abis Auto Transport, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Lea, Kelly).
December 29, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (wea, )
December 29, 2022 COURT ORDER: The court adopts in this case Judge Barker's standing orders, which may be obtained from his page on the court's website and may be updated without separate docket entry. All parties and counsel are ordered to stay abreast of the current standing orders and to comply with those orders and with the court's local rules. Noncompliance with those standing orders or local rules may result in a sanction or other disadvantage. (wea, )
December 29, 2022 District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (wea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bulnes v. Abis Auto Transport, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ely Bulnes
Represented By: Wade Austin Barrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abis Auto Transport, Inc
Represented By: Kelly Brent Lea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alberto Hernandez
Represented By: Kelly Brent Lea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?