In Re: David Michael Finn
| David Michael Finn |
| 6:2022mc00005 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle added. (gsg) |
Filing 4
ORDER assigning to Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 5/16/2022. (gsg)
|
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Reconsideration of Suspension by David Michael Finn. (Stalcup, Brett) |
| Filing 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by David Michael Finn as to #1 Order. Delivered 4/11/2022. (ndc) |
| Filing 1 Reciprocal Attorney Disciplinary Notice and Order removing David Michael Finn from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice in this Court. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 NDTX Order)(saenz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: David Michael Finn | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| In re: David Michael Finn | |
| Represented By: | Brett B Stalcup |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
