Mallard v. Krick et al
Chansler Depaul Mallard |
NFN Krick, NFN Gray, NFN Gillary and NFN Eason |
6:2023cv00065 |
February 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Jeremy D Kernodle |
K Nicole Mitchell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Chansler Depaul Mallard as to #8 Order, #7 Order, IFP form. Received 3/3/2023. (ndc) |
Filing 8 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY re #3 Complaint, filed by Chansler Depaul Mallard. ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of this order in which to either: (1) pay the statutory $402.00 filing fee, or (2) furnish an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/7/2023. (gsm) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO AMEND re #3 Complaint,, filed by Chansler Depaul Mallard. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/7/2023. (gsm) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 2:22-cv-00072. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: Case transferred to Tyler Division of Eastern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 2/1/2023) (awc) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2023.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Chansler Depaul Mallard must address the following deficiencies: (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS). Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiencies is 30 days. By separate order, the Court will transfer this matter to the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. Plaintiff is directed to serve all future filings in this case upon the Clerk of that district and division. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 2/1/2023) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Form) (awc) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2023.] |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Wed Feb 1 15:50:58 CST 2023 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2023.] |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against NFN Eason, NFN Gillary, NFN Gray, NFN Krick filed by Chansler Depaul Mallard. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (nhp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2023.] |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (Attachments: #1 General Order Concerning Litigation) (nhp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2023.] |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (nhp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2023.] |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. (Copy of 1st page of Complaint also mailed to Plaintiff) Fri Apr 1 15:35:46 CDT 2022 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.