Lampkin v. Corder et al
Plaintiff: Esaw Lampkin
Defendant: Chaplain Jerry Corder and Cody Barnett
Case Number: 6:2023cv00402
Filed: August 11, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeremy D Kernodle
Referring Judge: John D Love
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2023 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Esaw Lampkin as to Order #3 . Unclaimed. (wea, 6)
September 7, 2023 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court should deny Plaintiff leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee and summarily dismiss this action with prejudice as to the refiling of another in forma pauperis lawsuit raising the same claims, but without prejudice to the refiling of this lawsuit upon payment of the full $402.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 9/6/2023. (wea, 6)
August 28, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Esaw Lampkin. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit/Declaration, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(jbe, 6)
August 23, 2023 Filing 4 Certified mail return receipt 7022 1670 0001 4278 5903 re #1 Order (jbe, 6)
August 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER. Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this order to either pay the $402 filing fee or submit an application to proceed IFP. The Clerk of Court shall accept no other documents from Plaintiff until he has complied with this order, with the exception of a motion for extension of time. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/14/2023. (wea, 6)
August 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER TO SEVER as filed in 6:23cv108. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/11/2023. (wea, 6)
August 11, 2023 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. MAILED Consent form to Plaintiff. (wea, 6)
July 17, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Cody Barnett, Jerry Corder, filed by Esaw Lampkin. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(wea, 6)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lampkin v. Corder et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esaw Lampkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chaplain Jerry Corder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cody Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?