Atkins v. Director, TDCJ
| John Louis Atkins |
| Director, TDCJ |
| 6:2023cv00447 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT #6 by John Louis Atkins. (klc, ) |
| Filing 11 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by John Louis Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter/Envelope)(gsm) |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by John Louis Atkins as to #3 Order. Received 9/14/2023. (ndc) |
Filing 9
ORDER denying as moot #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/29/2023. (gsm)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Louis Atkins. (Attachments: #1 IFP Financial Data, #2 Cover Letter/Envelope)(gsm) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Louis Atkins.. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 09/20/2023. (klc, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/18/2023. (wea, 6)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Louis Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Financial Data, #2 Cover Letter/Envelope)(gsm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Louis Atkins. Petitioner has thirty days from receipt of this Order to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a properly supported application to proceed IFP. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/8/2023. (gsm)
|
| Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mitchell (gsm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by John Louis Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Grievance Forms, #2 Cover Letter/Envelope)(gsm) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (gsm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Atkins v. Director, TDCJ | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Louis Atkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director, TDCJ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
