Contreras v. Sheriff Larry Smith
| Benito Contreras, Jr. |
| Sheriff Larry R Smith |
| 6:2023cv00546 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| John D Love |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TO FILE SECOND AMENDED PETITION. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 12/14/23. (jbe, 6)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 12/14/2023. (wea, 6)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Larry R Smith, filed by Benito Contreras, Jr. Related document(s): #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Benito Contreras, Jr..(wea, 6) |
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Benito Contreras, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wea, 6) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting extension re #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner has thirty days from receipt of this Order to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit the required certificate in support of his application to proceed IFP in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 12/6/2023. (wea, 6).
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Benito Contreras, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(wea, 6). |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Benito Contreras, Jr on 11/9/2023 as to #3 Order. (gsm) |
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER. Petitioner has thirty days from receipt of this Order to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a properly supported application to proceed IFP in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 11/8/2023. (wea, 6)
|
| Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (wea, 6) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. MAILED Consent form to Petitioner. (wea, 6) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Benito Contreras. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(wea, 6) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Contreras v. Sheriff Larry Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Benito Contreras, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Sheriff Larry R Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
