Spiro v. Eastman Chemical Company
| Sandra Spiro |
| Eastman Chemical Company |
| 6:2023cv00608 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. A Scheduling Conference is set for March 5, 2024 at 10:30 AM in Ctrm 353 (Tyler) before Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 1/26/2024. (wea, 6)
|
| Filing 9 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) AND (2) Disclosure Statement filed by Eastman Chemical Company (Mitchell, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Eastman Chemical Company.(Mitchell, Michael) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Spiro. Eastman Chemical Company served on 1/4/2024. (Botros, Paul) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Eastman Chemical Company. (ndc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Of Filing Proposed Summons by Sandra Spiro (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Summons)(Botros, Paul) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DESIGNATING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The court designates Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell to the full extent authorized by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) to handle all pretrial matters in this case, including dispositive motions. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 12/8/2023. (wea, 6).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REGULATING PRACTICE. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker. (wea, 6)
|
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Sandra Spiro (Botros, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Eastman Chemical Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9852437.), filed by Sandra Spiro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Botros, Paul) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Sandra Spiro. (wea, 6) |
| District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (wea, 6) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (wea, 6) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spiro v. Eastman Chemical Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sandra Spiro | |
| Represented By: | Paul M Botros |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eastman Chemical Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael David Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
