Fortner v. Spire Recovery Solutions LLC et al
Plaintiff: Dianne Fortner
Defendant: Spire Recovery Solutions LLC and Metacorp, LLC
Case Number: 6:2023cv00631
Filed: December 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeremy D Kernodle
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 3/19/2024 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 2/8/2024. (gsm)
January 31, 2024 Filing 7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Metacorp, LLC (Martin, Eugene)
January 30, 2024 Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Spire Recovery Solutions LLC (Martin, Eugene)
January 29, 2024 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Metacorp, LLC, Spire Recovery Solutions LLC.(Martin, Eugene)
January 13, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dianne Fortner. Spire Recovery Solutions LLC served on 1/8/2024. (Saks, Yaakov)
January 13, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dianne Fortner. Metacorp, LLC served on 1/8/2024. (Saks, Yaakov)
December 27, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Metacorp, LLC and Spire Recovery Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ndc)
December 27, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metacorp, LLC, Spire Recovery Solutions LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9888178.), filed by Dianne Fortner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Saks, Yaakov) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/29/2023: #3 Civil Cover Sheet (flattened)) (wea, 6).
December 27, 2023 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dianne Fortner. (wea, 6)
December 27, 2023 District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle added. (wea, 6)
December 27, 2023 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (wea, 6)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fortner v. Spire Recovery Solutions LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dianne Fortner
Represented By: Yaakov Saks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spire Recovery Solutions LLC
Represented By: Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metacorp, LLC
Represented By: Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?