Burns v. Burns
| Eric Dewayne Burns |
| Fairy Jean Burns, Joel Baker, Taylor B. Heaton, Greg Neeley and John F. Berry |
| 6:2024cv00042 |
| February 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Other Fraud |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 OBJECTION to #13 Amended Report and Recommendations by Eric Dewayne Burns. (WEA) |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Eric Dewayne Burns as to #13 Report and Recommendations. No date provided. (NDC) |
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Eric Dewayne Burns as to #10 Report and Recommendations. Received 3/12/2024 (wea, 6) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that the claims against Fairy Jean Burns and John Berry be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It is further recommended that the claims against former judge Joel Baker, Judge Taylor Heaton and Justice Greg Neeley be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/19/2024. (wea, 6) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Joel Baker, John F. Berry, Fairy Jean Burns, Taylor B. Heaton, Greg Neeley, filed by Eric Dewayne Burns. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(wea, 6) |
| Filing 11 OBJECTION to #10 Report and Recommendations by Eric Dewayne Burns. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(wea, 6) |
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/8/2024. (wea, 6) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Fairy Jean Burns, filed by Eric Dewayne Burns. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wea, 6) |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Eric Dewayne Burns as to #7 Order. Received 2/17/2024. (ndc) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of this Order to file an Amended Complaint showing a basis for federal court subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/14/2024. (wea, 6)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Dewayne Burns. (wea, 6) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Eric Dewayne Burns, filed by Eric Dewayne Burns. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wea, 6) |
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. (wea, 6) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (wea, 6) Modified on 2/2/2024 (wea, 6). MAILED Consent form to Plaintiff. |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Dewayne Burns. (wea, 6) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fairy Jean Burns, filed by Eric Dewayne Burns. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Appendices, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(wea, 6) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Eric Dewayne Burns. (wea, 6) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
