Peterson v. McKennedy et al
Plaintiff: Richard David Peterson
Defendant: David Able, Nancey McKennedy and Major Unknown Smith
Case Number: 6:2024cv00287
Filed: August 12, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: J Campbell Barker
Referring Judge: K Nicole Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2024 Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Admin of Inmate Trust Accounts Gregg County Jail as to #3 Order Re Collection and Payment of Full Filing Fee. Received 8/20/2024. (ndc)
August 14, 2024 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Objections due within 14 days of receipt. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 8/14/2024. (wea)
August 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING FILING FEE. The Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed IFP. No partial filing fee shall be assessed. Plaintiff to pay balance of the full filing fee in installments. The agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to the Plaintiff's inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis, provided the account balance exceeds $10.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 8/14/2024. (wea)
August 12, 2024 Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mitchell (gsm)
August 12, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Richard David Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gsm)
August 12, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (gsm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. McKennedy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard David Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Able
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancey McKennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Major Unknown Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?