Combs v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
| Garrett Combs |
| SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana |
| 6:2024cv00433 |
| November 22, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2) Disclosure Statement identifying party citizenship filed by Garrett Combs (Cooper, Michael) |
Filing 6
ORDER REGULATING PRACTICE. Ordered by District Judge J. Campbell Barker. (wea)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER (DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL ANSWER AS FILED IN STATE COURT ACTION) as to #4 Complaint by SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana.(wea) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT (PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AS FILED IN STATE COURT ACTION) SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana, filed by Garrett Combs.(wea) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Certificate of Notice of Removal by SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana (Leary, Kieran) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) AND (2) Disclosure Statement filed by SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Safeco Corporation, Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation, Corporate Parent Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc. for SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana. (Leary, Kieran) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana from 3rd Judicial District Court, case number CV24-0559-3. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10513739), filed by SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Leary, Kieran) |
| District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (wea) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (wea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Combs v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana | |
| Represented By: | Kieran Warren Leary |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Garrett Combs | |
| Represented By: | Shaun Wesley Hodge |
| Represented By: | Michael Edward Cooper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.