Johnson v. Gregg County Jail
| Sadrick Bevard Johnson |
| Gregg County Jail |
| 6:2026cv00082 |
| February 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER of deficiency re #3 Complaint,, filed by Sadrick Bevard Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/11/2026. (gsm)
|
| Case: Johnson vs Gregg County Jail was filed and assigned to Judge Mitchell. (gsm) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 3:26-cv-00263. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Pursuant to LR CV-7(j), other than in a prisoner case, any motion pending in the transferor district is considered moot, has been terminated, and must be re-urged to be considered in this district. |
|
Filing 4
Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Tyler Division Division of Eastern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 2/6/2026) (knb) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/6/2026.]
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Gregg County Jail filed by Sadrick Bevard Johnson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (cfk) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/6/2026.] |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (cfk) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/6/2026.] |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/6/2026.] |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Mon Feb 2 16:54:25 CST 2026 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/6/2026.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Gregg County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sadrick Bevard Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gregg County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
