Johnson v. Love et al
| R. Wayne Johnson |
| John D Love and Jay R Combs |
| 6:2026cv00094 |
| February 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt by R. Wayne Johnson on 3/18/2026 as to Notice of Mailing #4 . (grt) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, Motions terminated: #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Jay R Combs, John D Love, #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by R. Wayne Johnson. (Motion(s) #3 , #2 terminated). Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 3/12/2026. (grt)
|
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #4 mailed to R. Wayne Johnson at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Inmate ack. req. (grt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Jay R Combs, John D Love. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McClendon, J) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by R. Wayne Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jbe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jay R Combs, John D Love from Raines County District Court, case number 12087., filed by Jay R Combs, John D Love. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(McClendon, J) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. (gsm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.