Barnhill v. Halim et al
| Cody Barnhill |
| Charles Halim and Eric Moore |
| 6:2026cv00107 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Acknowledgment of Receipt by Cody Barnhill on 5/21/2026 as to #14 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, #15 Judgment. (gsm) |
| Filing 15 Final JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 5/14/26. (jbe) |
Filing 14
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cody Barnhill, #4 Report and Recommendations. (Motion(s) #2 , #4 terminated). Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 5/14/26. (jbe)
|
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #14 , #15 mailed to Cody Barnhill at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Inmate ack. req. (jbe) |
| Filing 13 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Cody Barnhill. (gsm) |
| Filing 12 Acknowledgment of Receipt by Cody Barnhill on 4/21/2026 as to Notice of Mailing. (grt) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply given 20 days from the entry of this order. Clerk shall furnish copies of the orders cited. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 4/15/2026. (grt)
|
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #11 , #4 mailed to Cody Barnhill at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Inmate ack. req. (grt) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 Report and Recommendations by Cody Barnhill. (gsm) |
| Filing 9 Acknowledgment of Receipt by Cody Barnhill on 3/24/26 as to #8 and #7 Orders. (kcv) |
Filing 8
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/16/2026. (gsm)
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #4 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Responses due by 4/16/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/16/2026. (gsm)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 Report and Recommendations by Cody Barnhill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gsm) |
| Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt by Cody Barnhill on 3/4/2026 as to #4 Report and Recommendations. (gsm) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the United States Magistrate Judge re #1 Complaint filed by Cody Barnhill. The Court should accordingly deny Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and summarily dismiss this action with prejudice. Objections due within 14 days of receipt. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 2/24/2026. (gsm) |
| Case reassigned to District Judge J. Campbell Barker and Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. (gsm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Cody Barnhill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(gsm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cody Barnhill. (Attachments: #1 Financial Data, #2 Envelope)(gsm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (fee not paid), filed by Cody Barnhill. (Attachments: #1 Grievance Forms, #2 Envelope)(gsm) |
| Case: 6:26-cv-107, Barnhill v Halim, et al was filed on 2/23/2026 and assigned to Judge Mitchell. (gsm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.