Cox v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
| Quinton Cox |
| Director, TDCJ-CID, Eric Guerero, Tony O'Hare, Robert D Oberlender, Dakota Morse and Warden Jamadre L. Enge |
| 6:2026cv00270 |
| June 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Case: Cox v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al was filed on 6/8/2026 and assigned to Judge Mitchell. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Pro Se Instructions and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (grt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Quinton Cox. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s) Income Statement)(grt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Director, TDCJ-CID, Jamadre L. Enge, Eric Guerero, Dakota Morse, Tony O'Hare, Robert D Oberlender (fee not paid), filed by Quinton Cox. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Exhibit 1A-1Q, #3 Exhibit 2A-2C)(grt) (Attachment 3 replaced on 6/8/2026) (grt). (Attachment 2 replaced on 6/8/2026) (grt). |
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #3 and copy of docket sheet mailed to Quinton Cox at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Inmate ack. req. (grt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
