Perkins et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company
| Clarinda Perkins and Darius Perkins |
| AmGuard Insurance Company |
| 6:2026cv00428 |
| September 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Travis Cade Armstrong on behalf of AmGuard Insurance Company (Armstrong, Travis) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2) Disclosure Statement identifying party citizenship filed by AmGuard Insurance Company (Peirce, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AmGuard Insurance Company from 114 Judicial District Court of Smith County Texas, case number 26-2101-B. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11786113), filed by AmGuard Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit B Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit C Original Answer, #4 Exhibit D Policy Declarations, #5 Exhibit E List of Parties and Counsel, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Supp/Removal case)(Peirce, Jonathan) |
| Case: Perkins et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company was filed on 9/9/2026 and assigned to Judge Kernodle. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is attached. (grt) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. (grt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
