Neil v. Texas Department of Corrections et al Case transferred to the Lufkin Division
| Ray Allen Neil |
| Texas Department of Corrections, Brian Collier, Brian Smith, S Johnson, T Austin, M. Cunningham, FNU Baxter, FNU Amburn, FNU Redwine and JOHN DOE |
| 6:2026cv00510 |
| October 19, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| John D Love |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Case: Neil v. Texas Department of Corrections et al was filed on 10/19/2026 and assigned to Judge Love. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Pro Se Instructions and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (grt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Ray Allen Neil. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(grt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (fee not paid), filed by Ray Allen Neil. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Envelope)(grt) |
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #3 and docket sheet mailed to the recipients listed in the NEF. Mail type: Inmate ack. req. (grt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
