Cicero v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Christopher Lamar Cicero |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Joseph B. Edlow and Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng |
| 6:2026cv00516 |
| October 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng, Joseph B. Edlow, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons, #3 summons, #4 summons)(grt) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Christopher Lamar Cicero. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons, #3 summons, #4 summons)(grt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng, Joseph B. Edlow, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11880469.), filed by Christopher Lamar Cicero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hacking, James) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. (grt) |
| Case: Cicero v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al was filed on 10/21/2026 and assigned to Judge Kernodle. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is attached. (grt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
