Dubea v. Simpson
Plaintiff: Mick J Dubea
Defendant: John C Simpson
Case Number: 9:2007cv00063
Filed: March 23, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Lufkin Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Thad Heartfield
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 163 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION that extending such jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Therefore, this Court's exercise of jurisdiction over Simpson satisfies the requirements of due process. Accordingly, Simpson's motion to dismiss should be denied. Signed by Judge Thad Heartfield on 3/2/09. (djh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dubea v. Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mick J Dubea
Represented By: Gregory F Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John C Simpson
Represented By: James Michael Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?