Flentroy v. Sizemore
Petitioner: Charlie Flentroy
Respondent: Micheal Sizemore
Case Number: 9:2010cv00164
Filed: October 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Lufkin Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: Ron Clark
Presiding Judge: Judith K. Guthrie
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM Adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge and Entering Final Judgment. The petitioner's objections are overruled and the writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED sua sponte. All pending motions in this civil action are DENIED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 1/31/11. (leh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flentroy v. Sizemore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charlie Flentroy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Micheal Sizemore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?