Trowbridge, Jr. v. Giblin
Plaintiff: John Parks Trowbridge, Jr.
Defendant: Keith F Giblin
Case Number: 9:2016cv00086
Filed: June 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Lufkin Office
County: Tyler
Presiding Judge: Marcia A. Crone
Presiding Judge: Zack Hawthorn
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Giblin's motion to dismiss 4 is granted in accordance with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and all other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/20/17. (ljw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trowbridge, Jr. v. Giblin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith F Giblin
Represented By: Brian Walters Stoltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Parks Trowbridge, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?