Martinez v. Striblin
Plaintiff: Malachi Samuel Martinez
Defendant: Kimberly Striblin
Case Number: 9:2018cv00030
Filed: February 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Lufkin Office
County: Angelina
Presiding Judge: Ron Clark
Presiding Judge: Zack Hawthorn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 7/26/19. (ljw, )
November 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 11/17/18. (ljw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez v. Striblin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malachi Samuel Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly Striblin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?