Harrison v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
| John Harrison |
| Merlin Cleveland, Li-Yun Chuo, Executive Director Lorie Davis, Donald Muniz, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Angel Rhem and University of Texas Medical Branch-Correctional Managed Health Care |
| 9:2019cv00207 |
| November 7, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Ron Clark |
| Zack Hawthorn |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by John Harrison ON 12/3/19 as to #3 PRELIMINARY FILLING FEE ORDER. (ljw, ) |
Filing 3
PRELIMINARY FILING FEE ORDER. Plaintiff shall, within twenty (20) days from the date set forth below, submit either the $400.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a statement certified by an authorized prison official showing the average balance in and deposits into plaintiff's inmate trust account for the preceding six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 11/25/19. (ljw, )
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by John Harrison. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope)(ljw, ) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER of Severance. (Original Case 9:19cv107) Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 11/7/19. (ljw, )
|
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (ljw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
