Hardin v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
Lavern Hardin |
Li-Yun Chuo, Merlin Cleveland, Executive Director Lorie Davis, Donald Muniz, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Angel Rhem and University of Texas Medical Branch-Correctional Managed Health Care |
9:2019cv00208 |
November 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Ron Clark |
Keith F Giblin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with data sheet by Lavern Hardin. (bjc, ) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Lavern Hardin as to #3 Preliminary Filing Fee Order. (jmv, ) |
Filing 3 PRELIMINARY FILING FEE ORDER. Plaintiff shall, within twenty (20) days from the date set forth below, pay the $400 filing feeor submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis including a statement certified by anauthorized prison official showing the average balance in and deposits into plaintiffs inmate trustaccount for the preceding six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 11/21/19. (jmv, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lavern Hardin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope)(ljw, ) |
Filing 1 ORDER of Severance. (Original Case 9:19cv107) Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 11/7/19.(ljw, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin. (ljw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.