Lindsey v. Greaff et al
| George D Lindsey |
| Bryan Weatherford, Tyler Bruton, Joann Harvey and Michael Greaff |
| 9:2019cv00219 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Lufkin Office |
| Ron Clark |
| Zack Hawthorn |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER of Transfer re #3 MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding Venue. Plaintiff's claims should be transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 11/26/2019. (Lufkin Division Case No. 9:19-cv-219)(bmf)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding Venue. Plaintiff's claims should be transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 11/26/2019. (bmf) |
| Case transferred in from Beaumont Division on 11/26/2019. Case Number 1:19-cv-590. Case assigned to District Judge Ron Clark.(ljw, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by George D Lindsey. (mrp, ) |
| Filing 1 42 USC 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by George D Lindsey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mrp, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (mrp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
