Dobbs v. Texas Dept of Child Family Services et al
| Casey Dobbs |
| 222nd District Court of Oldham County and Texas Dept of Child Family Services |
| 9:2019cv00233 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Ron Clark |
| Keith F Giblin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from Texas Eastern has been opened in Northern District of Texas as case 2:20-cv-00028, filed 01/31/2020. (ljw, ) |
| Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of Texas Amarillo Division. (ljw, ) |
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. This matter is to be TRANSFERRED to the Amarillo Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 1/9/20. (ljw, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with data sheet by Casey Dobbs. (bjc, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Casey Dobbs. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Stay of State Court Proceedings by Casey Dobbs. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Casey Dobbs. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights) against All Defendants, filed by Casey Dobbs.(ljw, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin. (ljw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
