Nelson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Quincy LaJames Jones Nelson
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 9:2020cv00152
Filed: July 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ron Clark
Referring Judge: Zack Hawthorn
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Quincy LaJames Jones Nelson. (ljw, )
July 7, 2020 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Quincy LaJames Jones Nelson. (ljw, )
July 7, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Quincy LaJames Jones Nelson.(ljw, )
July 7, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (ljw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nelson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Quincy LaJames Jones Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?