Rodriguez, Jr. v. Rigsby et al
Frank W Rodriguez, Jr. |
FNU Woods, Frank Rigsby, Tommie Haynes, Kerri Howard and Center Control Officers |
9:2020cv00224 |
November 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Ron Clark |
Zack Hawthorn |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION to Terminate Suit by Frank W Rodriguez, Jr.. (ljw, ) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Frank W Rodriguez, Jr. (Attachment(s): #1 Declaration of Frank Rodriguez, #2 Memo in Support, #3 Exh. I - K, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope) (bjc, ). (Originally filed in 9:18cv46) |
Filing 2 ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 2/24/2018. (bjc, ) (Originally filed in 9:18cv46) |
Filing 1 ORDERED that the claims against other individuals involving events beginning in February, 2017, are severed from this action, and will proceed as a separate civil action. Frank Rigsby, Sergeant Woods, Kerri Howard, Tommie Haynes and unidentified center control officers shall be listed as defendants in the new action. Documents 1 and 2 shall be filed in the new action, while remaining filed in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 11/9/2020. (bjc, ) (Originally filed in 918cv46) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.